Mumford & Sons – Wilder Mind (Album Review)

1.5 / 5

There was a time when vagueness was a part of rock music. It was big in classic rock – Springsteen and AC/DC alike told stories of everymen that resonated, even though their details were ripped out of entry level creative writing classes. Think about Tom Petty’s “Free Fallin’” – it describes a very specific girl, but an everygirl. Mumford & Sons harken back to the days of classic rock storytellers on their first electric album, Wilder Mind. But then isn’t now. Mumford & Sons going electric doesn’t resonate like when Dylan did it – hell, they’re probably quieter here. And in an incredibly overpopulated music scene, with artists like FKA twigs, Grimes, Viet Cong and TWIABPAIANLATD melting and reforming hybrid genres, and artists crafting increasingly more specific lyrics – see Groin Twerk, Sometimes, King Kunta – vagueness isn’t going to get you anywhere.

“Monster.” That was my choice for the first ballad of the album when I first looked at the tracklist. Not because of the title, far from it – just because it was the sixth track. I was right. The album was predictable from the get-go; what you expect is presented almost exactly. The band sounds like any myriad of guitar-driven indie bands that’s existed from ’91 – present. There’s almost nothing memorable here. Wilder Mind stands equal with any of the non-Hot Fuss Killers albums, and any Coldplay album, as that album that most dads hold on to as a last grasp at trying to bond with their kids over music.

The album’s worst quality is that it isn’t worse than it is. If this album were actually worse, it could be fun-bad, like an ironic listen that you listen to for a laugh. But it’s just bland. It’s tepid, totally drained of life. There’s almost nothing enjoyable, and it’s forgotten before it’s even over. There are highlights, at least – the band sounds engaged on the opener “Tompkins Square Park,” a song that could stand as a Death Cab ripoff. And they do bring an energy to the table late on the album on “Ditmas.” But the two Brooklyn-named songs notwithstanding, nothing else works here.

Mumford & Sons came out of the gates swinging a few years ago, armed with banjos, a new sound that rivaled acoustic dubstep, and a ridiculous personae that couldn’t be ignored. It got old fast as they played themselves out, but they rode the world for a few years. Why they’d follow up a Grammy-pummeling album with this light-hearted, dull mess is beyond comprehension. Credit to a band trying to reinvent themselves, but Wilder Mind is just an old grenade, hissing with its pin pulled, and a crowd standing, slowly moving their fingers from their ears.


Andrew McNally, Music writer at Seroword

Like us on Facebook to receive Seroword updates

Join The Movement

Enter your email address below to subscribe to Seroword and support independent arts journalism.

Twitter Stream


  1. i’m glad you posted this. i dont listen to contemporary music – but i heard one song of there last tracks, i had to listen to another and another until i bought both the first two albums together & god i love them!!! i just love the warm blanket feeling i have as they flow over me. but i heard the new single. & nearly cried. i think i shouted at the tv! beautiful expressive, fresh, creative and soulful (to me) they’ve now decended into the cheap abyss. it just feels like they’ve lost their way – which is odd as they had conquered the world! but this…oh dear.such a huge, huge shame! still, i’m glad i can smile in enjoyment at the beautifully crafted first two albums. 🙂 🙂

  2. People quaff at the new album cause its stealing other peoples style. And doing not the best job at it. Yet they’re the indie-folk band that has been copied by everyone the last 8 years. I think that gives them right to use other bands musical style. And, if you listened to the album more than once, it kinda grows on you. I highly suggest at least trying to.

  3. 100 % agree. I had such s hard time putting words to why I didn’t like the album, but it was just okay, and lacked so much substance. Very well said.

  4. That’s about 1.5 more than I would have given them.

Leave a Reply